+1 Verified - No unexpected binaries in source package - LICENSE, NOTICE exists - Build from source - Signature - Run binary packages (netinst, all) - Run SparkInterpreter with spark-2.0 and scala-2.11
Best, moon On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:37 AM Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang < jzh...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Build it with profile spark-2.0, and ran tutorial note successfully. > AM & Executor logs are available in yarn-client mode. > > > > Best Regard, > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > On 8/12/16, 7:36 PM, "mina lee" <mina...@apache.org> wrote: > > >Hi folks, > > > >I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin 0.6.1 > >release. > > > >The commit id is c928f9a46ecacebc868d6dc10a95c02f9018a18e which is > >corresponds > >to the tag v0.6.1-rc2: > >* > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=c928f9a > >46ecacebc868d6dc10a95c02f9018a18e > >< > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=c928f9a > >46ecacebc868d6dc10a95c02f9018a18e>* > > > >The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zeppelin/zeppelin-0.6.1-rc2/ > > > >The release candidate consists of the following source distribution > >archive > >zeppelin-0.6.1.tgz > > > >In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided > >for user convenience at the same location > >zeppelin-0.6.1-bin-all.tgz > >zeppelin-0.6.1-netinst-all.tgz > > > >The maven artifacts are here > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1016/ > >org/apache/zeppelin/ > > > >You can find the KEYS file here: > >https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/minalee.asc > > > >Release notes available at > >* > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12336543&s > >tyleName=Html&projectId=12316221 > >< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12336543&s > >tyleName=Html&projectId=12316221>* > > > >Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 15/Aug PDT). > > > >[ ] +1 approve > >[ ] 0 no opinion > >[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >