+1

Verified
 - No unexpected binaries in source package
 - LICENSE, NOTICE exists
 - Build from source
 - Signature
 - Run binary packages (netinst, all)
 - Run SparkInterpreter with spark-2.0 and scala-2.11

Best,
moon

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:37 AM Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <
jzh...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

>
> +1
>
> Build it with profile spark-2.0, and ran tutorial note successfully.
> AM & Executor logs are available in yarn-client mode.
>
>
>
> Best Regard,
> Jeff Zhang
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/12/16, 7:36 PM, "mina lee" <mina...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin 0.6.1
> >release.
> >
> >The commit id is c928f9a46ecacebc868d6dc10a95c02f9018a18e which is
> >corresponds
> >to the tag v0.6.1-rc2:
> >*
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=c928f9a
> >46ecacebc868d6dc10a95c02f9018a18e
> ><
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=c928f9a
> >46ecacebc868d6dc10a95c02f9018a18e>*
> >
> >The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zeppelin/zeppelin-0.6.1-rc2/
> >
> >The release candidate consists of the following source distribution
> >archive
> >zeppelin-0.6.1.tgz
> >
> >In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided
> >for user convenience at the same location
> >zeppelin-0.6.1-bin-all.tgz
> >zeppelin-0.6.1-netinst-all.tgz
> >
> >The maven artifacts are here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1016/
> >org/apache/zeppelin/
> >
> >You can find the KEYS file here:
> >https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/minalee.asc
> >
> >Release notes available at
> >*
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12336543&s
> >tyleName=Html&projectId=12316221
> ><
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12336543&s
> >tyleName=Html&projectId=12316221>*
> >
> >Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 15/Aug PDT).
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >[ ] 0 no opinion
> >[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>

Reply via email to