Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1254
@bzz CI failure was due to test, fixed now.
Further, regarding the flexibility and narrowing scope. Revision class is
implemented
[here](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-zengine/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/notebook/repo/NotebookRepo.java#L106)
and as you can see currently when implementing your own NotebookRepo you reuse
same class (without implementing your own one). Implementing your own revision
class is a good idea which is not supported yet (it should be handled properly
in frontend as well).
The point of this PR was not to send unnecessary info in the Revision
object since only thing to identify the revision is supposed to be its
revisionId and it being String seems at least intuitive since noteId, and
paragraphId are identified in the same way by String id. So having noteId,
revisionId should uniquely identify the revision. Can you give some example of
ID that's more than one element and not presented as string?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
