How about we create release branch 'branch-0.6' from master on 15 June, 00:00 PDT, and start release process from that point?
Most of TLP migration has been done (except for git source repo / mirror migration) and we can always create minor release with spark 2.0 support if spark 2.0 support is not ready when we cut the release branch. Thanks, moon On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM Vinay Shukla <vinayshu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree, let's make our first release as a TLP. > > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 on release.If we could sort out Spark 2.0 great, if not we should have > > a release anyway. > > > > > > > > _____________________________ > > From: Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:44 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release > > To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > Thank you Moon for starting discussion, > > I can not agree more - it's time for another release, our first one as > TLP! > > > > As you said - there are many improvements, more then enough for a new > > release, but having Spark 2.0 profile there would be awesome. > > > > -- > > Alex > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016, 03:34 Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jonathan Kelly < > jonathaka...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Of course, but it would still be possible for Zeppelin to support > Spark > > > 2.0 > > > > using a Maven profile, right? (Handwaving the difficulty of doing so. > > I'm > > > > mainly just saying that we shouldn't say, "nah, can't do it because > > Spark > > > > 2.0 isn't GA yet.") > > > > > > > > > > Agree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, if Zeppelin 0.6.0 is released before Spark 2.0, and we > don't > > > > make Zeppelin 0.6.0 compatible with Spark 2.0, it may be several > months > > > > after the Spark 2.0 release before the next version of Zeppelin is > > > > releasable and supports Spark 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > I think releasing Zeppelin as a TLP will be much more easy now :) So > > there > > > is always the possibility to have a minor release with Spark 2.0 > support > > if > > > we don't get it on this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > >
