+0 (non-binding)

I found that the simple preemption example have different result comparing
to the previous release.

   -
   
https://github.com/apache/yunikorn-k8shim/tree/master/deployments/examples/preemption

Previous, if I followed the steps, there should have 2 pods running from
"normal-priority-job-with-9999-priority" job before the cleanup step.
However, I only got 1 "normal-priority-job-with-9999-priority" pod in
1.6.0-rc2. I have no clue why we have this behavior change.
[image: image.png]

I'm sorry for not conducting a comprehensive investigation, but today is
the last day of voting.
Therefore, I would like to confirm if this is also an unexpected behavior
for others?



Other items I've checked:

   - Verified signatures and checksums
   - Built on Ubuntu 23.04(amd64) with go1.22.2 linux/amd64, deploy on Kind
   1.29.1
   - E2E tests passed in a new created Kind Cluster
   - Check Restful APIs
   - Validated changes in
   - [YUNIKORN-2631] Support canonical labels for queue/applicationId in
   Admission Controller
   - [YUNIKORN-2504] Support canonical labels and align metadata retrieving
   order in shim
   - [YUNIKORN-2810] Throw a warning if a pod has inconsistent metadata


Yu-Lin Chen.
Best Regars.

Reply via email to