Thank you Chaoran for volunteering to be the release manager.
As with the previous releases I am here to help you through the process if
there are any questions.

Wilfred

On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 17:51, Chaoran Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> I volunteer to be the release manager this time, if nobody else has
> volunteered already.
>
> The proposed timeline sounds right to be. It will allow for ample time for
> stabilization and verification.
>
> Chaoran
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:48 PM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Wilfred
> >
> > Thanks. Sounds good to me.
> > Does anyone want to be the release manager for 1.0? The apache way
> > encourages more people to get involved in the release process.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:45 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg <
> > [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have been making big steps since our last release. Some major
> changes
> > > have gone in and some are almost ready. The changes include:
> > > - rest API updates
> > > - new node storage and sorting
> > > - upgrade to a later K8s version as a build dependency
> > > - scheduler interface change
> > >
> > > Work is ongoing on generating a new set of performance figures. This
> > > includes documenting how to run our performance tests so we can repeat
> > them
> > > when we want to.
> > >
> > > Based on all this work I would like to propose a 1.0.0 release to be
> > ready
> > > for a vote by the incubator PMC by the start of December 2021. This
> will
> > > give us some time to get the last fixes in and stabilise the release. A
> > > release for us is still a multistep project:
> > > - fork and prepare the release
> > > - vote in the project
> > > - vote in the incubator PMC
> > > Looking back at the last release cycles that means we should have a
> build
> > > ready for voting by 22 November on the dev list. Which would mean that
> we
> > > fork the release at the latest in the second week of November.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if the timeline is too ambitious or not ambitious
> > > enough.
> > >
> > > Wilfred
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to