That would explain it. Case closed. Thanks for analyzing the logs. 

Craig

> On Jun 8, 2022, at 07:13, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for
> the mail system.
> 
> The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as:
> 
> fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller
> than message_size_limit
> 
> These errors started at Jun  6 02:26:54 and stopped at Jun  7 18:38:26
> 
> AFAICT this allowed messages to be delivered to Whimsy, but they could
> not be forwarded to the mailbox.
> 
> It appears that the mail system did eventually deliver the messages to
> the Whimsy process.
> 
> I think this is  the cause of the delayed appearance of the mails.
> 
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 14:54, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Sebb,
>> 
>> I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. 
>> These did eventually show up  in secretary workbench after more than a day.
>> 
>>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB
>>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature)
>>> ICLA 05:56 85KB
>>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: <name elided> 08:44 254KB (script 
>>> signature)
>> 
>> I hope you can figure out what happened.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Craig
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 8, 2022, at 02:52, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently.
>>> 
>>> When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails.
>>> Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used.
>>> Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails.
>>> 
>>> If you have got some examples that you think should have been
>>> displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I
>>> will have a look.
>>> 
>>> Sebb
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back.
>>>> 
>>>> What happened?
>>>> 
>>>> Craig
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Craig
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry for not replying all...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in 
>>>>>> since yesterday.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I cannot troubleshoot this one...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Sebb,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see these in my inbox to secretary:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> subject/date (PDT)/size
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB
>>>>>>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature)
>>>>>>> ICLA 05:56 85KB
>>>>>>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: <name elided> 08:44 254KB 
>>>>>>> (script signature)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is 
>>>>>>> there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> while several ICLAs have been received.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are
>>>>>>>> not marked as deleted.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> AFAICT there are no such emails.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>>> c...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> c...@apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> c...@apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> c...@apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> c...@apache.org
>>>> 
>> 
>> Craig L Russell
>> c...@apache.org
>> 

Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org

Reply via email to