On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 at 13:08, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:01 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The vagrant code has not been touched since 2016 (2014 if you discount > > some generic changes). > > > > Seems little reason to keep it in the main branch. > > > > I propose to create a vagrant branch with the current code, and drop > > it from the default branch. > > > > Any objections? > > No objections to removing it from the main branch. I don't see a > reason to create a vagrant branch as if there ever is interest the > code remains in the history, but if you are inclined to create it - > again, no objections.
A branch should make it much easier to find the code - no need to delve into history. > > Sebb > > - Sam Ruby
