I'm happy to provide fallback code or some "alt tag". I just copy-pasted the HTML from https://www.apachecon.com/event-images/ so either the checker is wrong or the event html is wrong :)
Jan > 13. nov. 2021 kl. 11:20 skrev sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 at 02:29, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> What Jan refers to is listed as a standard (approved) method of listing >> events, >> and is described at: https://www.apachecon.com/event-images/ >> >> Regardless of personal opinions on JavaScript, surely an approved standard >> should >> be valid in the checker. > > It's not my personal opinion. For example [1] and [2]. No doubt there are > more. > > Javascript can cause issues for assistive readers, and may be > disabled, so should only be used to enhance a website, rather than be > essential to its function. > > We should not cause unnecessary problems for readers that cannot use > Javascript. > > Did the approval process consider accessibility requirements? > > Sebb > [1] > https://monsido.com/blog/accessibility-issues#accessibility-issue-7-javascript-rendering > [2] > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Accessibility/CSS_and_JavaScript#keeping_it_unobtrusive > >> On 2021/09/10 22:30:37 sebb wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 23:20, Jan Høydahl <jan...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The Website Checker complains about "Events" not being linked >>>> (https://whimsy.apache.org/site/check/events) for many projects. But we >>>> (Solr) do have the new JS way of adding ApacheCON banner: >>>> >>>> <a class="acevent" data-format="wide" data-mode="light" >>>> data-width="480"></a> >>>> >>>> but it is not accepted by the checker, it wants the page to have a static >>>> link to latest events. Should it also be happy if "acevents" script is in >>>> use? >>> >>> JavaScript should not be required in order to access essential parts >>> of the website. >>> >>>> Jan Høydahl >>>
