Hi Sebb, From: "zcq" <z...@zhucongqi.cn>Subject: Re: SIGN ICLADate: 2021-11-09 21:47 -08:00
From: Guillermo Cruz <guillermo.c...@slashdotmedia.com.INVALID>Subject: Re: Invitation to become Allura committer and PMC memberDate: > 2021-10-27 08:52 -07:00 I don't recall the "duplicate" ICLA that was found. My guess is that only the first possible duplicate is displayed. Would it be possible to make a log entry with the possible duplicates so we can more easily figure out what's going on? Perhaps we can discuss the algo that you use to detect possible duplicates. Has it changed recently? Thanks, Craig > On Nov 9, 2021, at 3:21 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 22:47, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> While filing a new ICLA, I got: >> Warning: Found possible duplicate ICLAs: >> Zhu Zhu >> >> There is no reason for this to be flagged as a possible duplicate. Maybe the >> possible duplicate check needs some tweaking? > > You'll need to provide a bit more context in order to investigate. > For example the exact timestamp of the email, or the hex hash used by > the secretary workbench. > I don't think either of them reveal any PII. > > Note also that the check is deliberately cautious: it is better to > flag a possible duplicate than to ignore an actual duplicate. > >> Regards, >> Craig >> >> Craig L Russell >> c...@apache.org >> Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
