> On Jul 6, 2020, at 1:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 18:14, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just one final observation. >> >> The emeritus work flow once this PR is merged: >> >> Member decides to go emeritus, navigates to their profile, and clicks >> (request emeritus). This generates an emeritus request document and sends >> mail to secretary. >> >> Secretary receives the mail, reviews the request, and files it in >> emeritus-requests-received, and sends mail to the member. >> >> Ten days (or so) elapse. >> >> Secretary remembers that there is a pending emeritus request, navigates to >> emeritus-requests-received, reviews the documents there, calculates the >> effective date, and then navigates to the member's profile, double clicks >> Member status, and clicks (emeritus). >> >> This can be improved: >> >> 1. The Member status box to (request emeritus) could directly put the >> request into the proper place in emeritus-requests-received and send mail to >> the member acknowledging the request. Secretary does not need to be involved >> at this phase. Member could still rescind the emeritus request without >> getting secretary involved. >> >> 2. The secretary workbench could scan the emeritus-requests-received along >> with the incoming mail and post a separate list of things to do if there are >> any pending emeritus requests. If secretary then examines the emeritus >> request document, actions could include (emeritus) which would then do what >> Member status does today. >> >> WDYT? > > Member may no longer have access to their password, so it must be > possible for them to email Secretary instead of using Whimsy.
In order for the member to file an emeritus request today they need to download a form from svn foundation/emeritus-request.pdf or .txt, sign, scan, and email. IIUC they cannot access svn foundation without a password. In that case, they would need to send email to secretary and hope that secretary will ack the request. Also IIUC, this has been done at least a dozen times before. So having access to the pdf form requires the same credentials as access to the whimsy __self__ page. Craig > >> Craig >> >>> On Jul 4, 2020, at 2:17 PM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I believe this PR is ready for final review. Please let me know if you have >>> any concerns. >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/94 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> c...@apache.org >>> >> >> Craig L Russell >> c...@apache.org >> Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
