On 16 January 2018 at 13:49, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> I haven't looked at the code itself yet, but here's some user comments.
>
> Craig Russell wrote on 1/13/18 12:38 PM:
>> Please take a look at these pages:
>>
>> whimsy.apache.org/project/icla
>
> - Where did you grab the navbar and header layout from?  Some of it I
> really like; the graphics layout not as much.  But a larger (and later)
> discussion should be: should we have a header/footer UX we use for
> interactive tools across whimsy?  I already have a standard
> header/footer on most of the "show me lists of data" tools (cgi's,
> mostly), but we're now building neat interactive tools like this, which
> are a little different from the UX perspective.
>
> - Having the edit boxes be red outlined (which implies bad data) to
> start with is a little odd.  But I dunno that it's worth changing that.

I've not looked at any of this.

But the colour reference jumped out at me; we should not be using
colour as the sole distinguisher for errors/warning/neither.
Not all people distinguish colours the same way; some cannot do so at all.

> - Adding form groups or <hr>-ish things between form sections would be
> nice.  I understand the progression once you've chosen the PMC you can
> then "start the discussion..." but it would be even clearer with better
> grouping of the different sections.
>
> - The email address field validates "test@shane" as a valid email
> address (requires at least a .ab domain name ending).
>
> - Interestingly, I got a ...undefined method 'empty?' for nil class...
> error and then Safari actually hung for a solid minute when pressing the
> Preview button... Can't even open the JS console for Safari.
>
> Have not yet looked at the code, not enough time yet.  But nice overall,
> and sounds like a great start to real workflow apps.
>> whimsy.apache.org/project/icla/discuss
>> whimsy.apache.org/project/icla/vote
>>
>> The forms are close to what I would like to ship. There is no processing 
>> behind them. That's next. But I'd really like a review for:
>>
>> elegance
>> content
>> behavior
>> maintainability
>>
>> There are some really inelegant parts of the forms and code and I'd like to 
>> fix these.
>>
>> Don't hold back.
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>
>
>
> --
>
> - Shane
>   https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources

Reply via email to