On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:21 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 April 2016 at 14:10, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:02 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 1 April 2016 at 13:48, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > I meant that the function would do a git pull or whatever it is that > the scheduled service does anyway. > I did not mean that the function would be able to add arbitrary code. > The code would still have to be committed to the git repo first. > > The auth would only be needed to prevent it being done unnecessarily.
I'll look into this. As of a few hours ago gitpubsub was enabled for git-dual repositories, including whimsy. It does mean that we would have another process that would need to be monitored, but that's no problem. That process would need to be able to update code, install gems, and touch files in the docroot. I'd like to do what I should have done from the beginning: create a local role account do to these updates. - Sam Ruby
