At present the groups defined in pit-auth are not included in public_nonldap_groups.json.
The source file is publicly accessible, so I assume it's OK to publish the group rosters. Assuming it would be useful to publish the groups, there are various ways to do this: A: Add a new output file B: Add a new top-level key (e.g. "pitgroups" or perhaps "pits" ;-) to the existing file C: Add to "groups" and add a marker - as is done for podlings - e.g. "pit": true Also, there are also several name references (e.g. buildbot, whimsysvn) which don't have definitions. AIUI these are defined to SVN without using LDAP auth. I assume such names should not be allowed as LDAP logins, so it might be useful to extract them. These should not be defined using option (C) above, but A or B should be OK. Thoughts? == Note that locally defined groups such as podlings are effectively only shorthand for the list of names they contain; they are not used directly for auth. So it does not matter if they are the same as an LDAP entry. Though defining a group such as 'clr=rubys,sebb' would be quite confusing!
