+1 I think this is a substantially improved proposal compared with the similar RFC from last year, being more concise and using a 2/3rds majority which feels appropriate.
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/102#issuecomment-1674529045 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/102/c1674529...@github.com>
