There were concerns that bought up in [RFC #95](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95) that this RFC conversation did not cover "how proposal fit into TVM". We agree that discussing the fit is important and would like to refer to related conversations and sections:
- https://github.com/YuchenJin/tvm-rfcs/blob/relax-upstream-rfc/rfcs/0089-relax-upstreaming.md#6-rationale-and-alternatives demonstrates the design deeply aligns with TensorIR, topi, symbolic shape and PackedFunc and many other modules. - https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89#issuecomment-1267729342 discusses the fit and how relax can address e2e dynamic shape compilation problem. - https://github.com/tqchen/tvm-rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/0091-establish-tvm-unity-connection.md outlines the fit of the unified composable flow. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89#issuecomment-1285757823 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89/c1285757...@github.com>
