I think this is a good idea. In my opinion it would be authors' responsibility not to abuse the new ability: the merge directive should be added only once the PR has reached an agreement. That is a subjective judgment, but it would be hard to codify it.
One question---what should happen if (1) PR is approved and looks non-controvesial, (2) author adds a merge directive, and then (3) some other reviewer requests changes? Should we expect the merge directive to be canceled? I think we should consider what is actually possible to implement in automation, maybe there is no way to handle this scenario. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-allow-merging-via-pr-comments/12220/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/7978914dd3eb5071717f2b42c4c53889d6661748afe767b007386ee70eb639da).
