@leandron @Mousius thanks for taking a look! @denise-k updated the RFC to address and scope security. I agree this is important. I think this covers the bit you're mentioning about CI security; I think given the themes of the roadmap, TVM security should fall more into a "release-oriented" roadmap. Currently we haven't specified a roadmap to hold any work around release infra. We could expand this one to hold it, but I'd rather merge this so we can make forward progress on adding the CI & Testing tasks we have now to the existing roadmap, and contemplate a release roadmap in a follow-on RFC. I do indeed want to continue hacking on my poetry-based Python dependency management thing soon.
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/54#issuecomment-1030441877 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/54/c1030441...@github.com>
