Hi @tqchen , thanks for the great feedback!

> This being said. It would still be good to get @MeeraN7 @giuseros 
> @sjoerdmeijer 's take on the possibility of using a normalized loop pattern 
> vs embedding into the vector. 

Yes, I can see that as being very useful. If my analogy is correct, the loop 
annotation corresponds to a loop pragma, and the scalable ramp/vector node to 
an IR extension. Like I wrote before, I think there's place for both of these 
concepts.

Can you please advise how to proceed? I guess we need to document this in the 
RFC. But do we want to prototype this too? Or do we just list it as an 
alternative, and discuss here what we would like to do first?

I have not yet commented on your remark about the ABI convention, as I am not 
familiar enough with TVM to comment about this. It looks though that is a 
solvable problem.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/18#issuecomment-933235514

Reply via email to