While working on unifying some device planning passes and cleaning up the TECompiler we noticed we have a lot of issues around how we transition from devices to Targets in the hetogeneous compilation flow. This pre-RFC is a stab at fixing those. There's a somewhat larger issue around bringing BYOC target name annotation and device planning closer together since they are very very similar but currently incompatible. However I don't understand the BYOC flow enough to launch into that.
I realize we normally start with a pre-RFC discussion on discord, but would like to experiment with having that conversation directly on GitHub. That way I can update the RFC text to account for discussion as we go, capturing where we have consensus and capturing alternatives directly in the text. Humor me? You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38 -- Commit Summary -- * <a href="https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38/commits/d4e54007a0fee68aa906f8bd578e01593a905fe0";>[checkpoint] first stab at summary</a> * <a href="https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38/commits/861366cf3e9e8636124c52fd495b0563871dc996";>[checkpoint] wrong dir</a> * <a href="https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38/commits/dc0f50e8857d2ba530daad840616d4dd55b621e1";>rewrite with focus on CompileOptions instead of TargetDevice</a> * <a href="https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38/commits/b3809e9b6615b788812d8f04975e42e4db0ca0b7";>Another rewrite.</a> -- File Changes -- A .gitignore (1) A rfcs/00xx-improved-multi-target-handling.md (175) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38.patch https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38
