Thanks for bringing this up!
Context is indeed a bad name when it is used to indicate a certain device, because its meaning really varies depending on the “context”. In this case, “device” is certainly an acceptable name and is a lot better than “context”. Two thoughts: 1) when referring to a remote device in TVM RPC, what word should we use? Right now we still use ctx. 2) in dlpack, we still use DLContext, so are we going to propose a name change in dlpack as well? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-rename-tvmcontext-to-tvmdevice/9090/2) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/63bf342dc026bb1a93c9ac66814173b97bcbfb6d37c1341b6cda9426ac0f5262).
