Thanks @merrymercy for this work! I have several questions regarding to this plan: 1. In Ansor paper there are relative performance number between current autotvm and ansor, it would be great to have some benchmark data in terms of latency. For example, for resnet50_v1 we can achieve 2.2 ms on p3(V100) and 5.4ms on c5.9xlarge, would be nice to see how much more improvement we can get with ansor. 2. In terms of deprecating autotvm, does it mean we will also deprecate current schedule system(op strategy as well?) Would it be better to introduce Ansor as a standalone module since we might still need handcraft schedule in some cases?
--- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-ansor-an-auto-scheduler-for-tvm-autotvm-v2-0/7005/3) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/8fa9cbb11cfbe78ea68b87a08bf88e5227b2017fc543d4f7e077411fe7e47eb1).
