These suggestion all makes sense. I think we should bring relay to ONNX support. The only choices we need to discuss so far are:
- C0: put the onnx under the export namespace, which could imply that it is a serialization format(and all of relay can serialize to it). - C1: put the onnx under `target/onxx`, which indicate that ONNX is a target that some relay function can lower to, but may not cover all the targets. Given that the main purpose of the support is for specific compatible runtime support suggested by most folks in this thread, I would recommend we take C1. Would be great to hear from others as well. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-to-onnx/6101/8) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/c3e630eba50d1fe1ecd169422675bb5af8c2fd305b7b8e78494311551b2e5c6c).
