[quote="grwlf, post:28, topic:1721, full:true"] Let me stress the attention on the fact, that MLIR doesn’t only offer different IR, it also offers different approach to scheduling via its Polyhedral dialect. For example, I see affine transformations as types in the standard. [/quote]
This is what I meant in my post [quote="aca88, post:14, topic:1721"] 1. MLIR seems to (natively?) support descriptions targeted for polyhedral dialects. Since TVM does not use the polyhedral model, I guess we would be limited in the usage of this information but could it also be an impairment? [/quote] Since the loop transformations which TVM does are a subset of all possible with the polyhedral modelling, I guess we would be ok. Obviously, TVM could offload part of scheduling to MLIR and invoque from there the polyhedral dialect. That I think is part of the goal of MLIR that the "right" dialect is used for the right part of the whole compilation task --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/google-lasted-work-mlir-primer/1721/31) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/d9b590096a9b5016ef22b5deb029b0e69b0f02aa6cb1ce48a6b1cb3ce7a26a7d). Tianqi Chen, UW, Seattle, WA, 98105, United States http://tracking.discuss.tvm.ai/tracking/unsubscribe?msgid=pl0Z742JX_NcE8WB3Qs-DA2
