Looks like the kills win over the abstentions. On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:42 PM Alan Carroll <a...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Yes. That's now a language feature, we should KIWF. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Masakazu Kitajo <m4s...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:28 PM > To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org > Subject: Re: What should we do with noncopyable.h? > > I'd say get rid of it (when we delete the C++ API). I don't like having > that kind of general utility in our tree. > > Masakazu > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 7:20 AM Walt Karas <wka...@yahooinc.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/include/tscpp/api/__;!!Op6eflyXZCqGR5I!DtAV_NUKzsvyOd7eta3YSBxYbPPgA-oeg4IopWnZVbdK61mfm6bJVjdvI689ZtsH75-U-QyBneu7ZHVKKQfy$ > > noncopyable.h > > > > Given that the C++ API is deprecated in 10 and will be deleted in 11. > > Should we get rid of noncopyable (since it's less useful in C++11 and > > later)? Or, move it to tscpp/util ? > > >
