> On 25 Jun 2023, at 1:13 pm, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> We don’t really support OS versions per se anymore. The one most people used
> to use, CentOS 7, is so outdated that its toolsets and libraries are not
> usable.
>
> Rather, we set version requirements on all the dependencies. This was done a
> few years ago, and that’s what Chris is suggesting we update for OpenSSL.
Ah, fair enough. Since OpenSSL 1.1.1 is EOL, it seems reasonable to require
more current versions
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/
>
> I think there’s a page somewhere listing the current minimum versions?
>
> — Leif
>
>
>
>> On Jun 24, 2023, at 20:41, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 24 Jun 2023, at 2:52 am, Chris McFarlen <ch...@mcfarlen.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> As part of updating the build system to cmake we are looking for areas to
>>> simplify the build. One area could be the conditional checks and
>>> preprocessor defines around features added to openssl on or before 1.1.1.
>>> This email is to propose and get feedback for making the minimum supported
>>> version of openssl be version 1.1.1 and to cleanup the code to assume the
>>> same.
>>
>> What OpenSSL versions are provided on the supported OS and distribution
>> versions?
>>
>> J
