No worries. It's optional. Please use it when you need it, like remind people to review your issues or PRs.
For packages, let us know when it's available! — Masaori On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:42 AM Jered Floyd <je...@convivian.com> wrote: > > > Hi Masaori, > > I don't always have time for Slack (too many chat programs at once...) but > please do send me an invite and I'll drop in when it's helpful. > > Fedora packages are in the review queue now, so hopefully that is approved > shortly and I can request EPEL branches after. > > Regards, > --Jered > > ----- On Apr 25, 2022, at 10:24 AM, Masaori Koshiba masa...@apache.org wrote: > > > Great news! I'm really happy to hear we'll have official Fedora/EPEL > > repo. Because we've received requests for a long time. > > > > Actually, we had a little discussion at ASF slack channel recently. If > > you're not there, let me know. I'll invite you. > > > > — Masaori > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 7:13 AM Jered Floyd <je...@convivian.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hello! This is just a short note to introduce myself, and share a new > >> packaging > >> effort for Fedora and EPEL-using (RHEL, CentOS, etc.) Linuxes. > >> > >> You can review and test ATS 9.1.2 packages for these platforms here, but I > >> intend for them to be in the official repo soon. > >> [ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jered/trafficserver/ | > >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jered/trafficserver/ ] > >> > >> A few notes on these packages: > >> > >> 1) traffic_manager and traffic_server do not run as root; instead they run > >> as > >> the "trafficserver" user and systemd grants CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE for > >> access to > >> privileged ports. > >> > >> 2) I've written an SELinux policy module that is run as enforcing. It > >> works for > >> me, but it's possible that I am missing permissions for some plugin > >> behaviors. > >> If something isn't working right for you, please check your SELinux logs > >> first > >> and let me know if tuning is needed. One this is accepted into Fedora there > >> will be an official bug tracker. > >> > >> 3) There is no build for CentOS Stream 9 because the tscore HKDF tests > >> fail with > >> OpenSSL 3.0.2 and cs9 doesn't include a compat-openssl1.1 package (nor will > >> RHEL 9). This is probably an OpenSSL bug but I haven't investigated further > >> yet. This is noted in the overall ATS/OpenSSL 3.0 ticket: [ > >> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/7341 | > >> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/7341 ] > >> > >> As for who I am, I standardized some years ago on ATS for my personal > >> infrastructure on Debian. A few years ago I joined Red Hat and this month > >> finally decided I should migrate to our distros as part of a platform > >> refresh, > >> but ATS was not packaged.... so I foolishly decided that becoming the > >> Fedora > >> package maintainer would be easier than migrating to a different reverse > >> proxy. > >> :-) > >> > >> Regards, > > > --Jered
