Oh I see, for cases where there is no status? On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:13 AM Walt Karas <wka...@verizonmedia.com> wrote:
> Hmm, you can't use TSHttpHdrStatusGet() ? > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 9:19 AM Sanjay Singh <ssin...@linkedin.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to propose a change to an existing TS API, "TSHttpTxnAborted". >> >> The current function signature: >> TSReturnCode >> TSHttpTxnAborted(TSHttpTxn txnp) >> >> Propsed change: >> TSReturnCode >> TSHttpTxnAborted(TSHttpTxn txnp, bool *client_abort) >> >> Currently, the purpose of the API is limited to providing success/error >> on overall transaction aborts. This change addresses a particular use case >> (recently encountered at LinkedIn), where we want to distinguish >> client-side aborts from the actual server aborts. While client aborts may >> not be indicative of any direct problems with downstream servers, it's the >> server aborts that can be used as passive health-checks for the downstream >> origin hosts. Also, this makes troubleshooting the 'transaction aborts' >> easier because now we are able to eliminate an entire set of either >> client-side or server-side investigations, due to the ability to >> distinguish between them. >> >> Related PR - >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_trafficserver_pull_7901_files&d=DwIFAw&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=bRwMsdu0uyXK0N-ngQ91KF2IzpTwU-AXjOlCZnyKc_4&m=qYzq-K1DFB-0WtAYFEqLglCWduKafWjkWiuFVkNJ32o&s=vzW3keuEw7ZayW8TrKNgcut5vkUYNnvx0UiTi6xtHs0&e= >> Related gh issue - >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_trafficserver_issues_7902&d=DwIFAw&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=bRwMsdu0uyXK0N-ngQ91KF2IzpTwU-AXjOlCZnyKc_4&m=qYzq-K1DFB-0WtAYFEqLglCWduKafWjkWiuFVkNJ32o&s=UL5cp-5P8f3U_Wb69key5fOQSdYiY-c5VLtmxD0amfw&e= >> >> Please provide your feedback and let me know if more information is >> needed from my side. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sanjay >> >>
