This would be during a config reload. It's not uncommon to end up with the
same regex showing up multiple times in that file with different expiration
times. The error made comes from choosing too long a TTL for the revalidation
rule.
On 11/17/20, 7:40 AM, "Alan Carroll"
<solidwallofc...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID> wrote:
Is this all in the same configuration? Or duing a config reload?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:39 PM Olsen, Brian
<brian_ols...@comcast.com.invalid> wrote:
> Never mind that's too hard to keep track of. The idea here is that if a
> new regex_revalidate rule comes in with the same regex as an active but a
> different expiration time it should act as though a new rule came in.
>
> On 11/13/20, 11:59 AM, "Olsen, Brian" <brian_ols...@comcast.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
> For safety's sake it might be best to take the rule expiration that's
> furthest away (including any already loaded rules) and reset the
> activation/epoch.
>
> On 11/13/20, 10:03 AM, "Sudheer Vinukonda"
<sudheervinuko...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
> Sounds reasonable to me.
> Unless, it breaks some backward compatibility that can't be worked
> around, it feels that this behavior can be made the default (without any
> need of a config even).
> Thanks!
> Sudheer
> On Friday, November 13, 2020, 08:38:43 AM PST, Olsen, Brian <
> brian_ols...@comcast.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Through traffic control we have the limited ability for CDN
> customers to add revalidation requests. Unfortunately there are times
when
> assets need to be revalidated multiple times due to whatever reason.
>
> The way regex_revalidate works now it is first rule wins, meaning
> that once a rule (regex) is loaded any attempts to reissue that rule again
> is ignored.
>
> To work better with this self service case I’d like to propose
> that when regex revalidate sees a new rule with a changed expiration that
> this new rule’s expiration time becomes the new expiration time and the
> activation time is reset to this new load time.
>
> I think it would be best to add some parameter to regex_revalidate
> so that it works in this way.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
