In the first case it should return 0. In the second case it should return 61000.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:02 PM Walt Karas <wka...@verizonmedia.com> wrote: > The current behavior that I'm seeing for TSUrlPortGet() is that for this > request: > > printf "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: mYhOsT.teSt:61000\r\n\r\n" | nc localhost > 61001 > > it returns 80. Should TSUrlRawPortGet() return -1 ? > > For this request: > > printf "GET http://mYhOsT.teSt:61000/ <http://myhost.test:61000/> > HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n" > | nc localhost 61001 > > TSUrlPortGet() returns 61000. Should TSUrlRawPortGet() also return 6100 ? > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:31 PM Alan Carroll < > solidwallofc...@verizonmedia.com> wrote: > >> After discussions, this will be changed to TSUrlRawPortGet that returns 0 >> if the port is not explicitly present in the URL. >> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:28 AM Walt Karas >> <wka...@verizonmedia.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> This gets the port string in the URL. If the port is not in the URL, it >>> returns nullptr (and sets length to zeor). Note this is subtly different >>> from TSUrlPortGet which always returns a valid port, the canonical port >>> for >>> the scheme if the port is not specified. Currently there is no way to >>> detect this from a plugin. >>> >>> char const* TSUrlPortGet(TSMBuffer, TSMLoc, int* length); >>> >>
