Some notes:

maskit - we can just add another enum value. You're right that it should
probably not be "ProtocolType" because it may be unrelated. "PriorityType"
would probably be better as a name.

There shouldn't be a "0_9" - I thought we had agreed to not support that at
all anymore.

There should be an INVALID of some sort, equivalent to AF_UNSPEC.

I agree with maskit that the indirection isn't worth it for the ID.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:08 PM Masakazu Kitajo <mas...@apache.org> wrote:

> Actually, I don't understand TSHttpProtocolType. Shouldn't it be
> StructureType? Let's say we support a new priority scheme that is available
> on both H2 and H3. What would be the TSHttpProtocolType for it?
>
> Masakazu
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:37 AM Masakazu Kitajo <mas...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 I'm ok with the new function signatures that use abstract structures.
> >
> > However, I'm not sure if we really need that flexibility for Stream ID, I
> > can't say 64-bit is big enough, but I think extensibility is not
> > everything. Usability matters. Should we prepare for 128-bit stream ids
> > now? Would we take the same approach for TSUrlPortGet to prepare for
> 32-bit
> > port numbers?
> >
> > Masakazu
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 7:35 AM Brian Neradt <brian.ner...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I updated the protocol draft with this input (notice I kept the updated
> >> API
> >> implementation as the second commit in the PR for the sake of
> comparison):
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/7149__;!!Op6eflyXZCqGR5I!R1jXXdxiTw57gMmYf4tr78KcBgZfbbrmlMwrL-m5hwDyQg7Ue6tcXgslvNZ9bxq2Wr5rdqwl9w$
> >>
> >> The API now looks like the following:
> >>
> >> tsapi TSReturnCode TSHttpTxnClientStreamIdGet(TSHttpTxn txnp,
> >> TSHttpStreamId *stream_id);
> >> tsapi TSReturnCode TSHttpTxnClientStreamPriorityGet(TSHttpTxn txnp,
> >> TSHttpPriority *priority);
> >>
> >> TSHttpStreamId and TSHttpPriority are now abstract structures that can
> >> reference TSHttp2StreamId and TSHttp2Priority objects. In the future we
> >> can
> >> expand this to include version 3 values of these. Notice that the above
> >> are
> >> generic to the specific HTTP protocol type used by the transaction.
> >>
> >> I'll hold off on updating the docs in the PR until I get confirmation
> that
> >> this looks OK to the community.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Brian
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:20 PM Brian Neradt <brian.ner...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This sounds good to me. This essentially puts the type parameter in
> the
> >> > structure itself rather than as a separate parameter to the functions.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alan Carroll
> >> > <solidwallofc...@verizonmedia.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Sorry for chiming in late -
> >> >>
> >> >> Note this is extremely similar to IP addresses and I recommend we use
> >> the
> >> >> same solution. That is, there is a class HttpPriority which has just
> a
> >> >> type/style/family value and possibly a length. This is an abstract
> >> class
> >> >> like sockaddr (which no one actually instantiates). The family
> >> indicates
> >> >> the concrete type, which is something like Http2Priority or
> >> Http3Priority,
> >> >> etc., just like sockaddr_in and sockaddr_in6. When you call the
> >> priority
> >> >> getter, it returns a HttpPriority* which is a pointer to a concrete
> >> >> instance, the type of which is determined by the family. Again, just
> >> like
> >> >> getting an IP address from a socket.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > "Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will
> >> > give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for
> >> > I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for
> >> > your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light."
> >> >
> >> >     ~ Matthew 11:28-30
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will
> >> give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for
> >> I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for
> >> your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light."
> >>
> >>     ~ Matthew 11:28-30
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to