+1 - Creates lock contention and shouldn’t be used in a production system.
-Bryan
> On Apr 7, 2020, at 8:07 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Accidentally (I blame Bryan …) we discovered that using this log tag can put
> some noticeable pressure on mutexes in the librecords subsystem. You’d use it
> like
>
> %<{proxy.process.version.server.build_number}record>
>
>
> Seeing that this (ab)use of librecord is not how it was intended for, if no
> one really objects, I’d like to recommend that we mark this log tag as
> “Deprecated” for 9.0.0 (it’ll still function), with a big fat warning on
> performance problems. And then for 10.0.0, we remove it.
>
> If people have use cases like the above, Randall and I would like to suggest
> that we simply implement normal log tags (which was tried before, and was
> shutdown unfortunately).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> — leif
>
> P.s
