Hello,

i tried new installations on centos7 and centos8
on both server the webp support and some others from the experimental branch can not get built.
did anyone run into the same problem ?

i used a centos7 minimal install and did the following:

---------------------


yum update -y
yum install setuptool -y
yum install ntsysv -y
yum install curl -y
yum install -y libtool
yum install gcc -y
yum install make -y
yum install openssl -y
yum install pcre -y
yum install libcap -y
yum install flex -y
yum install hwloc hwloc-devel -y
yum install lua -y
yum install zlib -y
yum install curl -y
yum install curl-devel -y
yum install ncurses-devel ncurses -y
yum install perl-devel -y
yum install libunwind libunwind-devel -y

yum -y install http://rpms.remirepo.net/enterprise/remi-release-7.rpm
yum -y install epel-release yum-utils

yum-config-manager --disable remi-php54
yum-config-manager --enable remi-php73
yum -y install php php-cli php-fpm php-mysqlnd php-zip php-devel php-gd php-mcrypt php-mbstring php-curl php-xml php-pear php-bcmath php-json

yum -y install ImageMagick ImageMagick-devel
yum install libwebp* -y
yum install git
yum -y install python3 python3-devel

yum install ImageMagick-c++-devel

/***  gcc++17:  ***/
yum -y install centos-release-scl
yum -y install devtoolset-7-gcc*
scl enable devtoolset-7 bash


git clone https://github.com/apache/trafficserver.git


git pull     /*    - to be on safe side :-)
autoreconf -if
./configure --enable-experimental-plugins --prefix=/opt/ts
make
make check
make install
--------

trafficserver builds without any error. checking out the libraries, following modules are found:
please check attached screenshot "centos7-modules.jpg"
no webp-trans.so.



i did similar stuff on centos8 Minimal install.
there for i had to install GraphicsMagick, GraphicsMagick-devel and GraphicsMagick-c++-devel instead of Imagemagick. thats the only difference at both installations.

centos8 has the same modules built. please see attached "centos8-modules.jpg"


where can i look for errors ? should i save and check the output of make for something missing or is the webp-module simply not included on some other reason ?


Thank You


kind regards

Juergen




On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 23:10:14 -0000 Evan Zelkowitz  wrote:
That would be pulling from master, which will be version 10

It looks like the webp plugin requires having the ImageMagick library installed 
and at >=7
Also make sure you are running configure with --enable-experimental-plugins, 
since webp is in experimental you have to add that to try to have any of those 
plugins built.

The users list is the appropriate one.  We can also invite you to the ASF slack 
channel if you prefer that

On 2020/02/11 21:17:40, "juergenp [core]" <juerg...@core.at> wrote:
Hello all !!!i'm new to apache Trafficserver and still confused about 
versioning.
it seems i'*m running version 10?  i pulled here: 
https://github.com/apache/trafficserverApache Traffic Server - traffic_server - 
10.0.0 - (build # 020216 on Feb  2 2020 at 16:53:44) 
<https://github.com/apache/trafficserver>
My current built version runs currently without special problems but i tried to 
build for example the experimental webp support module and did not get it 
working.make doesnt create the .so file.do i need a different version for that ?
which mailing-list  / users group is the correct one for traffic server with 
release 10  - in case i got questions ?i dont want to spam all of you.
thank you all for your help !
-- Juergen
**Best Regards
Jürgen Paulhart
E-Mail / SIP / XMPP : juergenp@core.atVoIP / Mobil: +43 676 30 59 244
*** Information Technologies & Hosted Unified Communications ***
<** Diese Nachricht is signiert. Der Inhalt wurde während des Transfers nicht verändert 
**><*** .. and if you don't know, now you know, ... ***>


**
Best Regards

Jürgen Paulhart

E-Mail / SIP / XMPP : juerg...@core.at
VoIP / Mobil: +43 676 30 59 244

*** Information Technologies & Hosted Unified Communications ***

<** Diese Nachricht is signiert. Der Inhalt wurde während des Transfers nicht verändert **>
<*** .. and if you don't know, now you know, ... ***>

Reply via email to