That doesn't seem to account for the proto object used in the class allocator. I think you might be OK with std::unique_ptr anyway, because it default constructs to a nullptr.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:03 PM Walt Karas <wka...@verizonmedia.com.invalid> wrote: > Does this, https://godbolt.org/z/4muzR3 , satisfy everyone that instances > of std::unique_ptr can be member variables of classes with class allocators > (as long as ~unique_ptr() is explicitly called in the destroy function)? > Kvetch now or forever hold your kvetch. >
