> On May 30, 2019, at 9:52 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 31, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Randall Meyer <randallme...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to rename ssl_server_name.yaml to sni.yaml for ATS 9. This would
>> also affect the toplevel key in the yaml config file (making the contents
>> rooted under "sni"). The code/classes it is used to configure is SNIConfig.
>> And personally, I find the current name to be a bit of a mouthful.
>
> Do you think this is worth the downstream costs of everyone that configures
> the file having to change?
Also, I believe the YAML in 9.0.0 for this configuration would not be
compatible anyways, because we’re working towards a “unified” YAML name space
(with the goal of being able to have one, single config file if someone so
desires).
Cheers,
— Leif
>
> J
