As someone who deliberately breaks ATS's ability to modify configs, +1 :) On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:54 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On May 10, 2019, at 10:10 AM, Sudheer Vinukonda < > sudheervinuko...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Just to confirm, when you say "..make this behavior the only supported > behavior in v9.0.0..", are you implying to not persist dynamic config > changes into records.config? > > Assuming the answer is yes, I'm +1 on the proposal to make that as the > de-facto and only behavior. > > > Correct. ATS would no longer have the capabilities of writing > configurations back to disk. > > — leif > > > Thanks, > > Sudheer > > On Friday, May 10, 2019, 8:08:08 AM PDT, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I’d like to propose that we remove the configuration option > proxy.config.disable_configuration_modification, > and make this behavior the only supported behavior in v9.0.0. I know of at > least one user who would appreciate this … > > Doing so, would also let us eliminate all the Rollback.cc > <http://rollback.cc/> code, and the use of that. There’s no longer a > point in rolling back old versions, since there won’t be any. > > And discuss. > > — Leif > > >
