No I don't think so. It's a gcc feature so it should pull in what's required.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:08 PM Dk Jack <dnj0...@gmail.com> wrote: > btw, do I need to link it with any additional libraries to use lsan? > Thanks. > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dk Jack <dnj0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Pushkar, I'll try that... > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:44 PM Pushkar Pradhan > > <pprad...@verizonmedia.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Perhaps compiling with LSAN will help: --enable-lsan enable > >> stand-alone Leak Sanitizer > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:42 PM Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Looking at the graphs it looks like your headers and http1client > >> sessions > >> > are leaking. Have you looked at this example to on how to send back > >> error > >> > messages using the C++ API: > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/example/cppapi/customresponse/CustomResponse.cc > >> > > >> > -Bryan > >> > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 3:50 PM, Dk Jack <dnj0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > I am trying to chase a memory leak issue. I am using ATS version > 6.2.3 > >> > and > >> > > I have a custom plugin written using the c++ API (atscppapi) running > >> on > >> > the > >> > > same server. I enabled memory dump in my configuration and sent > >> traffic > >> > > into the ATS with and without my plugin for an hour. Later, I > >> extracted > >> > the > >> > > individual memory stats and plotted the stats for each object type > >> > against > >> > > time. The link shown below contains side-by-side plots for each ATS > >> > object > >> > > type without and with my plugin (the right side figures are with my > >> > plugin > >> > > enabled). > >> > > > >> > > > >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/rfszd6fnjydm8s7/ats_mem_stats_comparison.pdf > >> > > > >> > > Without my plugin, the memory consumption increases for various > >> objects > >> > in > >> > > the beginning and then tapers off. However, with my plugin enabled, > >> the > >> > > memory consumption is higher and more erratic. I am not holding on > to > >> the > >> > > request in my plugin. My plugin attaches TransactionPlugin to some > >> > > transactions (sending back 4xx response to client). For most others, > >> it > >> > > lets it pass through. My plugin, doesn't allocate much memory. The > >> memory > >> > > it allocates is sort of semi-static (manages a few maps that are > >> updated > >> > > periodically). I don't anticipate my plugin's memory consumption to > >> > > increase with the transactions. > >> > > > >> > > Since the presence of my plugin is the affecting the memory stats of > >> > > internal ATS objects, I am suspecting this could result of me not > >> using > >> > the > >> > > API correctly. Would appreciate if anyone can venture a guess as to > >> what > >> > > could be happening. Thank for help. > >> > > > >> > > Dk. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
