Masaori,

Sounds like good reasoning.  I am completely ok with moving the minimum
with 1.0.2 as long as CentOS 6 is dropped at the same time.

WRT the vulnerabilities in 1.0.1, RedHat has been cherry-picking back
security fixes from newer openssl's into their Openssl 1.0.1 version, so it
is probably not that dangerous to use it.

Susan

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 7:25 PM Masaori Koshiba <masa...@apache.org> wrote:

> This is incompatible change, so the change will be done on next major
> release, ATS 9.
> We’re going to have OpenSSL 1.0.1 with CentOS 6 support on ATS 8 anyway. It
> looks like
> ATS 8 will end of life at similar timing of CentOS 6[*1]. So people using
> CentOS 6 can use
> OpenSSL 1.0.1 and ATS 8 until late 2020 by taking their own risks.
>
> # EOLs
> CentOS 6 : November 30, 2020
> ATS 8 : September 2020
> ATS 9 : July 2021
>
> ATS 9 looks good timing for dropping support of OpenSSL 1.0.1 and CentOS 6.
>
> FWIW, 15 vulnerabilities of OpenSSL were found last 2 years[*1]. I’m not
> sure how many of
> them affect version 1.0.1, but it looks quite dangerous to use it.
>
> [*1]
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-fe8a0be91ee3e7dea812e8694491e1dde5b75e6d
> [*2] https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
>
> Thanks,
> Masaori
>
> 2019年2月23日(土) 5:39 Susan Hinrichs <shinr...@verizonmedia.com.invalid>:
>
> > A quick search shows only instructions for how to build openssl 1.0.2
> from
> > source on Rhel6/Centos6.  If there is an epel-like rpm it does not seem
> to
> > be well advertised.
> >
> > I'd suggest keeping the openssl minimum version to 1.0.1 until we stop
> > support for Centos 6.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:41 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Feb 22, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Susan Hinrichs <
> > shinr...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Definitely at least drawing the line at openssl 1.0.1 makes sense.
> As
> > > Leif
> > > > notes moving to 1.0.2 for the baseline means that some supported
> > > > distributions cannot use the system openssl.  For Centos6 anyway we
> > > require
> > > > a replacement for the system compiler which you can acquire from
> > > > devtoolset.  Is there a similar epel mechanism to get a package for a
> > > more
> > > > modern openssl?
> > >
> > >
> > > I could not find one on my existing CentOS 6 images, which has both
> EPEL
> > > and DevToolSet yum repos enabled. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t
> > > other, non-standard repos with newer OpenSSLs, but I think we should be
> > > cautious recommending people to enable “rogue” yum repos in general.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > — Leif
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:53 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Feb 21, 2019, at 11:37 PM, Masaori Koshiba <masa...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Could we bump minimum requirements of OpenSSL version to 1.0.2 on
> > next
> > > >>> major release?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I just noticed that SSLUtils says that Traffic Server requires an
> > > OpenSSL
> > > >>> library version 0.9.4 or greater [*1].
> > > >>> But I think nobody is using such old OpenSSL. So we can bump
> minimum
> > > >>> version of OpenSSL.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> According to OpenSSL Release Strategy [*2], version 1.0.2 is
> current
> > > >>> minimum supported version by OpenSSL community.
> > > >>> And version 1.0.1 was end of support 2 years ago (at 2016-12-31).
> > > Version
> > > >>> 1.0.2 looks reasonable choice.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, we should do this for v9.0.0. This would effectively drop
> support
> > > for
> > > >> “stock” CentOS6, which only comes with OpenSSL v1.0.1, but I think
> > > that’s
> > > >> fine. For two reasons:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1) It’s the right thing to require at least 1.0.2, since 1.0.1 is
> not
> > > >> supported.
> > > >>
> > > >> 2) It’s not difficult to install a custom OpenSSL build if
> necessary.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> So, +1 on this, with the amendment that we also drop official
> support
> > > for
> > > >> the following platforms that are currently on the CI:
> > > >>
> > > >>        CentOS 6  (OpenSSL v1.0.1e)
> > > >>        Ubuntu 14.04 (OpenSSL v1.0.1f)
> > > >>
> > > >> (Debian7 was already dropped, because of lack of compiler support).
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >>
> > > >> — Leif
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to