I agree, there are other problems that would take priority over reimplementing 
the free list.

-Bryan



> On Dec 8, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 18:10, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> How does one migrate improper code properly?
> 
> You get rid of it. I’d argue that what we have works fine, has worked fine 
> for years and your are replacing with something that we will replace anyways.
> 
> Focus on real problems IMO.
> 
> — Leif 
> 
> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 5:54 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It's the same general idea as the current free lists, but with a
>>>> better, cleaner implementation.  If there are a lot of smaller dynamic
>>>> objects with short lifetimes, it will reduce thread blocking on the
>>>> heap mutex, block coalescing, and relatively complex changes to the
>>>> data structure of free blocks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I’m pretty meh on this proposal.  If it’s not broken, don’t fix it. I much 
>>> rather hold off until someone is interested in doing real work on migrating 
>>> the freelist over to jemalloc properly.
>>> 
>>> — leif
>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:54 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> What problem does solve? Does it make things faster?
>>>>> 
>>>>> — Leif
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 09:27, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This doesn't conflict with those efforts, and is much easier to do.
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:56 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I thought the efforts were to be focused on getting jemalloc optimized 
>>>>>>> with their concepts of arenas and NUMA affinity and thread ware 
>>>>>>> allocations?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> — Leif
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2018, at 15:02, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Would it be desirable for ATS to use this (cleaner) version of free 
>>>>>>>> lists?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ywkaras/MiscRepo/blob/master/Dynamic_obj/example.cc
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ywkaras/MiscRepo/blob/master/Dynamic_obj/Dynamic_obj.h
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The advantage is faster allocation/deallocation for small objects with
>>>>>>>> short lifetimes.  The disadvantage is we could reach heap exhaustion
>>>>>>>> more easily, as the free lists are reserving free memory for
>>>>>>>> allocation of a particular size (and where the size is a constexpr).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We would probably want to use conditional compilation for force
>>>>>>>> Large_threshold to 0 for FSAN builds and maybe debug builds also.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to