> On Sep 27, 2018, at 10:31 PM, Dk Jack <dnj0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I need to remap incoming traffic from a specific IP (connection IP) or
> traffic that is received on a specific port i.e ATS listening/server port
> to be sent to a specific IP+port. Distribute incoming traffic to multiple
> sites based on source-ip or listening port. For example, I want to do
> something like this:
> 
> map_with_recv_port 8081 http://10.1.10.1:8080/
> map_with_recv_port 8082 http://10.1.10.2:8080/ <http://10.1.10.2:8080/>


No, I’d expect it to look like this

        map_with_recv_port http://example.com:8081 <http://example.com:8081/> 
http://10.1.10.1:8080/ <http://10.1.10.1:8080/>
        map_with_recv_port http://example.com:8082 <http://example.com:8082/> 
http://10.1.10.2:8080/ <http://10.1.10.2:8080/>


The only (afaik) difference I know is that the match is done on the incoming 
port rather than what the request sent in the Host: header. So, a request like 
this (that connects to port  server port 8081) would still match the above:

        GET / HTTP/1.1
        Host: example.com <http://example.com/>


(notice the absence of a port in the request). This feature was done, I 
believe, where you might have a router, switch or load balancer in front of 
ATS, which remaps the incoming port (say 80) to a different destination port 
(say 8081) based on something else (like, source IP).


Try it and see if that helps.

— leif



> 
> 
> or
> 
> map_with_src_ip 10.1.1.1 http://10.1.10.1:8080/
> map_with_src_ip 10.1.1.2 http://10.1.10.2:8080/
> 
> With map or regex_remap, they allow me to filter on particular source IP.
> However, what I want is not filtering, but remap based on source-ip or
> listen port. Tried this:
> 
> regex_remap http://.*:8081/ http://10.1.10.1:8080/
> @actio=allow @src_ip=10.1.1.1
> regex_remap http://.*:8082/ http://10.1.10.2:8080/
> @actio=allow @src_ip=10.1.1.2
> 
> Since the regex matches all traffic (both from 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2), it
> always tries to send it to 10.1.10.1.
> 
> The documentation for map_with_recv_port says it should work exactly as
> map, but I haven't found a good example. The example, I showed above
> doesn't seem to work. Would greatly appreciate any tips or suggestions.
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Dk.

Reply via email to