+1 -Bryan
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > since we now have two of the “new” style LTS release branches, 7.1.x and > 8.0.x, it gets more problematic to deal with backport requests. The issue > comes down to the fact that a PR can only have one Milestone. My suggestion > is as follow: > > 1. The latest LTS branch has priority on doing “simple” cherry-picks, > and therefore, can update the Milestone accordingly. > 2. All other LTS branches will always require a second PR against that > particular branch. > > > For #2, the RM (e.g. me for 7.1.x) is at liberty to do such a PR him/herself, > however, the person proposing a Backport should be willing and expected to > make the PR if asked. Therefore, if you are not willing, or interested, in > making such backport PRs, please don’t propose a PR to be back ported to an > older LTS branch. > > I hope this makes sense? > > — Leif >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
