Anyone have any other thoughts? As of now Im contemplating doing the change to 
_ms internally, since at least that might help to mitigate records settings 
confusion across a CDN in the short term if we need this for our own purposes. 
I do like the idea of having types when it's time to yamilfy everything but 
didnt know if people would mind a short term change in names before then (like 
for 8.0.x) or if we hold off doing this in the community until yaml time
________________________________________
From: Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.INVALID>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 12:45 PM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Proposal] Change *attempts_timeout to milliseconds 
from seconds

Or jump off.


On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Alan Carroll
<solidwallofc...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
> I thought about that, but I think that's not the best approach because we
> want to make it more general, so it can have seconds or milliseconds. OTOH
> maybe that will have to wait until we YAMLize it. If we could do anything,
> I'd add the type "TIME" vs. "INT" and "STRING" and have that be seconds
> unless modified with a suffix like "ms" or "minutes", etc. I may take a
> look at how hard that would be. Unless Walt wants to jump in?
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 1:22 PM Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Would it perhaps be a good idea to add a _ms suffix to the config
>> variable names of timeouts that are not seconds?
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Zelkowitz, Evan
>> <evan_zelkow...@comcast.com> wrote:
>> > ?Currently all the attempts_timeout values are in seconds. We have seen
>> some issues where we believe being able to have a finer granularity over
>> this may help alleviate some problems.  Also for live streaming video in 2
>> second fragments a 1 second timeout does not provide as much control. So
>> proposing that we change these to milliseconds.
>> >
>> >
>> > We briefly discussed on IRC some alternatives such as using floats, but
>> that could introduce precision issues, as well as adding values such as
>> 'ms' 's' etc. The latter might be nice but that is a large change since
>> there currently is no units parsing for values in records.config so it
>> might be nice to have in the future but thats a much larger scope of work.
>>
>
>
> --
> *Beware the fisherman who's casting out his line in to a dried up riverbed.*
> *Oh don't try to tell him 'cause he won't believe. Throw some bread to the
> ducks instead.*
> *It's easier that way. *- Genesis : Duke : VI 25-28

Reply via email to