> On Jul 6, 2018, at 10:10 AM, xuchao@Gmail <xuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm try to fix the TVC double close bug with
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1765 .
>
> But the PR#1765 does not fix it and makes new crash.
>
> The 2nd solution to fix the issue
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/2907
> .
>
> That's all about the bug.
Does any of this need to go into 7.1.x or 8.0.x ?
Cheers,
— leif
>
> - oknet xu
>
> 发自我的 iPhone
>
>> 在 2018年6月29日，00:23，gksa...@gmail.com <gksa...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 2018/05/22 08:56:56, Chao Xu <ok...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi salil,
>>>
>>> please try to apply
>>> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/commit/49c903b0c13a2fd2c085325f6942326c4f9c926a
>>> .
>>>
>>> - Oknet
>>>
>>> 2018-05-14 22:03 GMT+08:00 salil GK <gksa...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I am using ATS 6.2.2 and found a crash happening in
>>>> TransformVConnection::do_io_close:467. This looks like bug 1765. But
>>>> while looking at that bug - it looks like that defect is not resolved
>>>> completely.
>>>>
>>>> Stack trace from my machine is as follows
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #1 0x00007f42727282a8 in _Unwind_Backtrace () from
>>>> /lib/x86_64/libgcc_s.so.1
>>>> #2 0x00007f427245fa88 in backtrace () from /lib/x86_64/libc.so.6
>>>> #3 0x00007f4274c9bd7f in ink_stack_trace_dump () at ink_stack_trace.cc:61
>>>> #4 0x00007f4274c9e2f3 in signal_crash_handler (signo=11) at signals.cc:180
>>>> #5 0x00005575fdf9f68a in crash_logger_invoke (signo=11,
>>>> info=0x7f427174e630, ctx=0x7f427174e500) at Crash.cc:169
>>>> #6 <signal handler called>
>>>> #7 0x00000000000000b8 in ?? ()
>>>> #8 0x00005575fdff8b5e in TransformVConnection::do_io_close
>>>> (this=0x5575ff57eb20, error=20600) at Transform.cc:467
>>>> #9 0x00005575fe08d691 in HttpTunnel::chain_abort_all
>>>> (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, p=0x7f426a9d56e8) at HttpTunnel.cc:1444
>>>> #10 0x00005575fe03761a in HttpSM::tunnel_handler_post_ua
>>>> (this=0x7f426a9d41b0, event=104, p=0x7f426a9d56e8) at HttpSM.cc:3505
>>>> #11 0x00005575fe08cdeb in HttpTunnel::producer_handler
>>>> (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, event=104, p=0x7f426a9d56e8) at
>>>> HttpTunnel.cc:1240
>>>> #12 0x00005575fe08dc3b in HttpTunnel::main_handler
>>>> (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, event=104, data=0x5575ff201e18) at
>>>> HttpTunnel.cc:1623
>>>> #13 0x00005575fdfa282f in Continuation::handleEvent
>>>> (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, event=104, data=0x5575ff201e18) at
>>>> ../iocore/eventsystem/I_Continuation.h:153
>>>> #14 0x00005575fe1f9a08 in read_signal_and_update (event=104,
>>>> vc=0x5575ff201d00) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:148
>>>> #15 0x00005575fe1f9da1 in read_signal_done (event=104,
>>>> nh=0x7f4271858cd0, vc=0x5575ff201d00) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:209
>>>> #16 0x00005575fe1fa61f in read_from_net (nh=0x7f4271858cd0,
>>>> vc=0x5575ff201d00, thread=0x7f4271855010) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:359
>>>> #17 0x00005575fe1fc78a in UnixNetVConnection::net_read_io
>>>> (this=0x5575ff201d00, nh=0x7f4271858cd0, lthread=0x7f4271855010) at
>>>> UnixNetVConnection.cc:933
>>>> #18 0x00005575fe1f0bc1 in NetHandler::mainNetEvent
>>>> (this=0x7f4271858cd0, event=5, e=0x5575ff06ec40) at UnixNet.cc:513
>>>> #19 0x00005575fdfa282f in Continuation::handleEvent
>>>> (this=0x7f4271858cd0, event=5, data=0x5575ff06ec40) at
>>>> ../iocore/eventsystem/I_Continuation.h:153
>>>> #20 0x00005575fe21fe1f in EThread::process_event (this=0x7f4271855010,
>>>> e=0x5575ff06ec40, calling_code=5) at UnixEThread.cc:148
>>>> #21 0x00005575fe22037c in EThread::execute (this=0x7f4271855010) at
>>>> UnixEThread.cc:275
>>>> #22 0x00005575fe21f312 in spawn_thread_internal (a=0x5575ff03ee10) at
>>>> Thread.cc:86
>>>> #23 0x00007f4272ecb633 in start_thread (arg=0x7f4271753700) at
>>>> pthread_create.c:463
>>>> #24 0x00007f427245198f in clone () from /lib/x86_64/libc.so.6
>>>>
>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>
>>>> What can I do to handle this ... Can I apply the solution mentioned
>>>> in that bug in my 6.2.2 source.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>> ~S
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Oknet Xu
>>>
>>
>> Do you have pointers on what circumstance, this issue could happen ?
