I see that oknet has a PR. I see PRs in total with the 6.2.3 milestone. While I am not working with 6.x anymore, I'm willing to work with Chris and others to shepherd in PRs to make new 6.x releases until the end of 2018. This would only be security fixes and very critical bug fixes.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Chris Lemmons <alfic...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm seeing a number of folks who'd like a stay of execution for ~6 > months on 6.2.x. Do we have a solid list of PRs we'd like to have > backported? > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > <efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > > I’ll add another voice to those asking for the 6.2 LTS to be extended. > > > > We are currently using 6.2 in production and would need at least 3 > months, preferably 6 to make the transition. > > > > Also, can you please update the traffic server downloads page?[1] It > still indicates 6.2 is the current LTS and 7.1 is just a stable latest > release. (The News section on the front page is correct) > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > > > > > [1]https://trafficserver.apache.org/downloads > > > > On May 30, 2018, at 1:26 AM, Zelkowitz, Evan <evan_zelkow...@comcast.com > <mailto:evan_zelkow...@comcast.com>> wrote: > > > > The ugprade really isnt that bad (at least from what I heard of the > experience from those who did the 6x upgrade before I did 7) > > > > If it helps you can skim my presentation from the traffic control summit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TC/2018+ > Spring+Summit+--+Boxborough%2C+MA > > > > Just go to the ATS@comcast presentation. With testing it can be done in > a few months, its mostly knocking out the old variables, setting up the new > logging, and the big one is the cacheurl to cachekey conversion since that > needs testing depending on what types and how complex your cacheurl regexes > are > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:51 PM > > To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Time to EOL 6.2.x? > > > > On May 29, 2018, at 10:47 PM, zzz <z...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Team, > > > > We're still on 6.2.x and have the plan to migrate to a newer version > later > > this year. However, the migration, from our previous experience, can > take > > 6+ months. > > +1 on postponing the EOL for another 6 months, if it works for everybody. > > > > > > > > Still, someone would have to take on the RM responsibilities for this. > > > > — Leif > > Thanks, > > Zizhong > > > > 2018-05-29 20:52 GMT-07:00 Chao Xu <ok...@apache.org>: > > > > Hi Leif, > > > > I still working on 6.0.x branch and pushed a PR#3539 for 6.2.x recently. > > > > The PR#3539 fix a bug for hostdb from 2.0.x ~ 6.2.x. > > > > :-D > > > > - Oknet > > > > 2018-05-30 7:40 GMT+08:00 Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 2018, at 17:10, salil GK <gksa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We too are in 6.2.2 and plans are in place to upgrade to 7.x in short > > while. But it may take some 3-4 months. > > I would love to see 6.2.2 support extend for another 6 months - ( is > > it too much expectation ! ) > > > > I won’t oppose that, if there is a RM that is willing to do the work. > > Right now, I know of no active committers that are still on 6.x, and > > that’s > > a real problem. > > > > — Leif > > > > On 30 May 2018 at 03:43, Chris Lemmons <alfic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, I'd love to be +1 on kicking 6.2 to the curb. > > > > But we've got a team using 6.2 that doesn't have immediate plans to > > upgrade to 7. There's some relatively important stuff chilling out in > > the pending release of 6.2 that will be fairly important. Am I the > > only one? > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > we have a few more weeks left on the expected LTS support cycle for > > 6.2.x. Are there any objections to officially EOL this release, say 2 > > weeks > > from now? So, we’d stop support for 6.2.x on June 15th 2018. > > > > If so, do we want to make one final 6.2.x release before such EOL? Is > > there anyone who needs it? :-) > > > > Thoughts? > > > > — Leif > > > > > > > > > > -- > > - Oknet Xu > > > > > > >
