I've looked over the suggestion and there are a few things that
confuse me. The list of hosts is separate from the weights. Maybe just
make weight an optional element of a host? And the "protocol" is
storing information about both the schema and the port. What if it
looked something like this?
name: consistent_hash
hash_key: uri
primary_ring:
- &p1
host: p1.foo.com
ports:
80: [ http1 ]
443: [ https1 ]
heathcheck:
url: tcp://192.168.1.1:80
weight: 1.0
- &p2
host: p2.bar.com
ports:
80: [ http1, http2 ]
443: [ https1 ]
healthcheck:
url: http://192.168.1.2:80
weight: 2.0
secondary_ring:
- &s1
host: p1.foo.com
healthcheck:
url: tcp://192.168.2.1:80
- &s2
host: p2.bar.com
healthcheck:
url: http://192.168.3.2:80
I'm not seeing immediately why we'd want hosts in multiple places, but
the above allows you to easily reuse the previous host entry if you
wish. Maybe if the file had multiple strategies:
strategies:
- name: consistent_hash
hash_key: uri
primary_ring:
- &one
host: one.example.net
weight: 1.0
- &two
host: two.example.net
weight: 2.0
- &three
host: three.example.net
weight: 1.0
secondary_ring:
- &backup
host: nevergoesdown.example.net
- name: rr
primary_ring:
- *one
-
<<: *two
weight: 5.0
secondary_ring: [ *backup ]
Or some other scenario where it would be useful to reuse the host definition.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:26 AM, John Rushford <jrushf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/3808
> and provide any comments on the proposed format of the parents.yaml
> configuration.
