> > >> I would like to propose that we move to C++17 for ATS 8.0.0.  This would
> > >> require us to move to gcc 7, clang 5, and icc 18 as minimum versions for
> > >> C++17 support.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > What does this move our minimum EL distro to? Can we still use 6?
> >
> >
> >
> > Also, since we went to C++11 a while ago, we already had to give up on the
> > CentOS6 native tool chain (so, for the last year or so, we’ve already
> > required Devtoolset to be used). This
> 
> 
> Yeah, this seems fine to me.
> 
> 
> > change would force us to update to devtoolset-7 on RHEL platforms, and
> > might make some older debian platforms impossible to support in any
> > reasonable way (which I’m ok with).

>From what i gather, this would also mean a minimum of FreeBSD 12.0, or else, 
>building from ports.
Given that the target is 8.0, this seems quite fine.


-- 
​​​​​​-- 
Igor Galić

Tel.at: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Tel.de: +49 (0) 162 383 26 98
Web: https://brainsware.at/

Checkout https://sealas.at/ The first end-to-end encrypted open-source 
accounting software!

Reply via email to