Walt - I think Derek is commenting stylistically, that if no Mutex is the
default for the C API, then it should be the default for the C++ as well.

What about a user conversion to TSCont in addition to an explicit method?
If you could, writing this up as a Sphinx API doc would be cool.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Alan Carroll <solidwallofc...@oath.com>
wrote:

> Indirectly. What's stored in the Continuation is a shared pointer to the
> Mutex. That shared pointer is destructed by TSContDestroy which may in turn
> destruct the Mutex (or not, if there are still references to it).
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure TSContDestroy() also destroys any mutex for the
>> continuation.  (Per our other discussion, I got exasperated trying to
>> make sure of this looking through the code with just vi.)
>>
>>

Reply via email to