> On Jan 31, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On Jan 29, 2018, at 11:02 AM, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> const char *TSIRemapFromUrlStringGet(const TSHttpTxn txnp); >> >> const char *TSIRemapToUrlStringGet(const TSHttpTxn txnp); >> >> These would return, from the transaction state object, >> url_map.getFromURL() and url_map.getToURL() respectively, in strong >> format. A null pointer would be returned if the values were empty. > > > Why is this needed? > > In a remap plugin, you have the to and from URLs already, so this would not > be needed at all (just call TSUrlStringGet() on those parameters). In a > regular plugin (continuation), I think we don’t have an API to get the To and > From URLs, but if so, it feels like what we really need is something like > > rule = TSHttpRemapRuleGet(txnp);
Ok, my slight bad, I see that your new proposal is more inline with what I saw in the first emails. — Leif > > and from there > > toURLString = TSUrlStringGet(rule->toUrl); > > > Or some such. Not sure if we’d expose a struct like this, or make it an > opaque handler and have getters on it, that is implementation details. > > — Leif >
