> On Jul 21, 2017, at 3:59 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > to avoid further ossification, I’d like to propose the following: > > 1. All new configuration files *must* be done using Lua syntax (with the > appropriate file extension)
I think in the previous thread on file extensions, I disagreed with this. Whatever the syntax, they are config files not generic Lua code. > 2. For major changes to an existing configuration file, we *strongly* > recommended to also include a migration to Lua. This is really a subset of upgrade tooling, which would be pretty useful. However, we haven't done this in the past and I have not seen any interest in this. If we want to do this it should be required. J
