Can you share your lua script in full with me? Thanks.
Kit On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Di Li <di...@apple.com> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Running 6.2.0 with cherry pick of TS-4497 to make the ts.fetch work, > otherwise it won’t even function. > > The performance came back with very terrible results, not sure the issue is > on the keep alive has been disabled for internal request or the ts.fetch lock > on itself > > I have running the ts.fetch or luasocket with a service on 127.0.0.1, so not > really remote request > > > without ts.fetch, I have 45156 req/s > > [root@Di-Dev wrk]# ./wrk -c 50 -t 20 -d 10 -s ./scripts/via_proxy_get1.lua > http://10.12.17.57:8080 > Running 10s test @ http://10.12.17.57:8080 > 20 threads and 50 connections > Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev > Latency 1.16ms 3.55ms 87.34ms 99.06% > Req/Sec 2.27k 596.33 3.49k 67.84% > 456054 requests in 10.10s, 374.47MB read > Requests/sec: 45156.39 > Transfer/sec: 37.08MB > > > with ts.fetch, I have roughly 80 req/s, simply add following into any hook > call back function > > local res = ts.fetch('http://127.0.0.1/ping', {method = 'GET’}) and no > process any data from the res, purely just call it. > > > > [root@Di-Dev wrk]# ./wrk -c 50 -t 20 -d 10 -s ./scripts/via_proxy_get1.lua > http://10.12.17.57:8080 > Running 10s test @ http://10.12.17.57:8080 > 20 threads and 50 connections > Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev > Latency 547.01ms 98.71ms 1.12s 84.97% > Req/Sec 4.46 3.06 20.00 77.60% > 712 requests in 10.02s, 598.66KB read > Requests/sec: 71.07 > Transfer/sec: 59.76KB > > > > with luasocket, I have roughly 19000 req/s, still a huge drop on performance, > that’s the reason we tried the ts.fetch, but come back with way much worse > results. > > > > Thanks, > Di Li > > > > >
