Can you talk about how you are using the clustering feature? Would parent proxying also work for your use case?
-Bryan > On Aug 29, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Nguyen, Hai <hngu...@forcepoint.com> wrote: > > I’m sorry for sending the feedback on this proposal late. Can we please keep > the clustering feature? We’ve been using it extensively here. > > Thanks, > -Hai > > From: Bryan Call [mailto:bc...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 3:20 PM > To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org > Cc: us...@trafficserver.apache.org > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing clustering support in 7.0.0 > > Thank you for all the feedback on this proposal. Removing clustering support > will be done in 7.0.0. > > -Bryan > > > > > On Aug 20, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org > <mailto:zw...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:18 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org > <mailto:jpe...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org > <mailto:bc...@apache.org>> wrote: > > There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS 7.0.0 release. > If you are using these features and require them, please respond to this > email. We also need to have people that are willing to invest time and fix > some of the bugs for these features. Your feedback is very important! > > There are a number of bugs filed against clustering. There are alternatives > to using clustering, such as parent selection and the CARP plugin that Yahoo > is open sourcing. If we are going to keep clustering supporting we would > need someone that is willing to work on the bugs. > > The proposal is to remove the configurations options for clustering and > remove the code for it. > > I've seen a few people asking about clustering recently, so it seems like > there is interest. But it *really* needs a code owner to make it live. Count > me as a +0. > > > A serious issue with the lack of developer support is that other areas of the > code suffers. Meaning, we have a hard time making progress with other areas > (like metrics, or configurations), because we don’t have anyone who’s testing > and maintaining the clustering feature. > > This is a tough one though, the general feature is useful, but we’re > seriously crippling ourselves with an unsupported legacy system. > > +0 from me as well. > > — Leif > > > > Scanned by Forcepoint Email Security Gateway > Click here > <https://esgpem.websense.com/pem/pages/digestProcess/digestProcess.jsf?content=c3805c5951889c5e05ab970ae3ca9cc1d4d703e3a16bba58faf015599e14c7422c0fe0e50f83ec29c6a066df750951d586cbd4b9c445f9f7ede47b5ff2432e6db5d9ab138ccf9f92096d50fce4041f5c685b71e990171ff43cba7313b924b534e998c2f8842e648735033d6e98ce3c50b6ef6e38032c0f11163d221beb5819204db1eb665a0f03fd0ef0444d79aef489> > to report this email as spam
